Argumentative-research essay related to Chaucer’s pilgrims in Dante’s Inferno Custom Essay

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”new”]

Write at least a 750 word argumentative-research essay related to Chaucer’s pilgrims in Dante’s Inferno. Pick at least five characters from the General Prologue of Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales and decide where they would wind up among the nine circles of Dante’s hell. Use impressions and quotes from both texts from the primary source to support your contentions. Each idea must then be supported by either the primary source or secondary sources. There must be sufficient citation to the sources to prove why the argument is valid.

Remember that the paper is an argumentative essay explaining how the characters from Chaucer’s pilgrims in the Canterbury Tales fit into the various circles of Dante’s Inferno. It is important to use the information in the general prologue of Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales to fully understand the characters to have a good grasp of where the characters fit into the various circles of hell. It will also be critical to understand all of the circles of Dante’s hell and the bolgia so you may properly articulate the Canterbury Tales characters suitability for a particular circle.

Grammar is critical for the creation of a successful paper. Not just the punctuation, but the sentence structure and the flow of ideas. Please ensure there has been proper proof-reading prior to completing the paper.

The paper must be typed in 12-point Times New Roman font with one-inch margins, and double spaced. Please utilize primary sources (The Norton Anthology of Western Literature, 8th ed., Vol. I: Divine Comedy: Inferno and Canterbury Tales) and at least three secondary (print) sources, using MLA guidelines for all citations. The secondary sources must be relevant to the argument, but may not be a different translation of the primary source. The primary source is mandatory, and may not be changed. The secondary source may be any book, or scholarly journal that could be used to help support the argument.

Put quotation marks around any words from sources. When writers use an open book for writing a paper or in taking notes, they must be careful not to plagiarize unintentionally.

Paraphrase material completely; changing or rearranging a few words or the tense of a verb is not paraphrasing. Writers should read the passage to be used, close the source book, and then write in their own words what they have read. They should then compare the paraphrase to the source; if by chance key words from the original are included, these should be changed or enclosed in quotation marks.

Give accurate and complete citations for all material. The St. Martin’s Handbook gives extensive information about MLA documentation style.

Avoid borrowing entire arguments or approaches to a subject from another writer. The paper should argue an original idea and should not be paraphrases of another writer’s work.

The paper must be an original work. The advantages to writers of a well-documented paper are obvious: documentation shows that writers know their subjects, and the citations give their ideas validity.

[meteor_slideshow slideshow=”slice”]

[sliceshow id=”5316″]